Egat Hillary Nwauzoije
The definition of youth has been a very difficult task with much
philosophy, as such when carrying out its Youth strategy, UNESCO uses different
definitions of youth depending on the context.For activities at international
or at regional level, such as the African Youth Forum, UNESCO uses the United
Nations’universal definition.The UN, for statistical consistency across
regions, defines‘youth’, as those persons between the ages of 15 and 24 years,
without prejudice to other definitions by Member States. All UN statistics on
youth are based on this definition, as illustrated by the annual yearbooks
of statistics published by the United Nations system on demography, education,
employment and health (UN, 2011).For activities at the national level, for
example when implementing a local community youth programme, “youth”may be
understood in a more flexible manner. UNESCO will then adopt the definition of
“youth” as used by a particular Member State. It can be based for instance on
the definition given in the African Youth Charter where“youth” means “every
person between the ages of 15 and 35 years”(due to delayed transitional phase
from youth to adulthood) (UNESCO, 2011).
Youth is best understood as a period of transition from the
dependence of childhood to adulthood’s independence and awareness of our
interdependence as members of a community. Youth is a more fluid category than
a fixed age-group. However, age is the easiest way to define this group,
particularly in relation to education and employment. Therefore “youth” is
often indicated as a person between the age where he/she may leave compulsory
education, and the age at which he/she finds his/her first employment. This latter
age limit has been increasing, as higher levels of unemployment and the cost of
setting up an independent household puts many young people into a prolonged
period of dependency.
Children and youth are particularly vulnerable as they undergo
critical developmental transitions, for example, graduating from secondary
school. Youths at this stage may be forced to postpone their plans for higher
education and instead seek increasingly scarce jobs in order to contribute to
the household economy. All of these changes can have profound and lasting
effects on the mental health of our nation’s children and youth, often causing
problems in terms of anxiety, lowered self-esteem and other
emotional/behavioral difficulties. Noting the epidemic of youth unemployment around
the world, nations are close to losing a generation of young people. One
essential ingredient to help grapple with these new problems is education.
During the industrial revolution, people left the farms and the leaders of
society understood that they needed public education. Today, there are needs to
be a similar revolution in education as we transit to the digital economy. We
also need to realign the capabilities of youth with the needs of labour
markets. The media plays a very key role in the development of the youth
through the creation of proper awareness to the entire youth and enabling them
to plan on their development.
In Nigeria, economic backwardness has played a wide role in
increasing the level of unemployment and poverty and/with secondary impact
traceable to disillusionments and rising rate of anti-social behavior among
youth. Youths are continually displaced and isolated from socio-economic plans
and resources that ought to increase their self-identity and self-worth. Across
several disciplines, there is growth in the tendency to view youth as out of
control and a threat to both society and themselves. Viewed from the context of
moral panic, youth have often been read as dangerous from media representation
and become an object of spectacle and desire for mass audience (Oswell, 1998; Giroux, 1997).
Irrespective of the diverse dimensions youths have been conceptualized, it is
still obvious that youths are victims of social change and at best an
endangered species in most Third World nations. Youths are always at the
receiving end of the economic environment dynamics. The situation functions to
increase youth disillusionment, intensifies hopelessness, poverty and increases
youth violence and crime across Nigeria’s landscape.
Nigeria government often engages in programmes which hardly
consider youth inputs and burdens. With increment in the denial of young people
becoming stakeholders in the contributions to decisions and material condition
of their existence, they look for alternative sources of satisfaction, some of
which may be akin to criminal activities. In Nigeria, the volume of youth in
crime is explained by socio-economic closure and attendant response in their
quest to belong in the face of annihilating or excruciating socio-economic
conditions. With prevalence of haphazard transitional process from adolescent
to adulthood, there is high tendency for crimogenic response to non-existence
of socio-economic opportunities. This is more so according to Rutherford (1992)
that youth without gainful employment, and lucrative responsibilities are more
likely to be involved in crime. The sub-culture of robbery, burglary, forgery,
cyber fraud and scam remain an important area of youth response to
socio-economic deprivation. Apart from the problem of unemployment and poverty
that generated current state of development, it must be agreed that Nigeria
youth lost their true identities because of several other factors prevalent in
Nigeria’s society. The endemic nature of corruption in Nigeria, displaced
morality and other contradictions inherent in post-independence constitution of
Nigeria function considerably in the destabilization of hope needed to usher
Nigeria youth to the dreamland.
In the words of Comrade President O.R. Tambo: “A country, a
movement, a people, that does not value its youth, does not deserve its
future”. Indeed, the movement needs to deepen its value for the youth and
harness its potential.Youth participation in development:
1.)
Strengthens young people's abilities to meet their
own subsistence needs;
2.) Prevents and reduces vulnerabilities to economic, political
and socially unstable environments;
3.) Promotes ownership and
sustainability of interventions;
4.) Helps gain entry into target communities and builds up trust and
social capital.
Solutions to Youth
Related Problems in Nigeria
The need to engage a comprehensive strategy for poverty
alleviation and youth economic empowerment remain the major solution germane to
youth problems in Nigeria. History has shown that major government alleviation
and development programmes often neglect the youths. Apart from the fact that
significant economic programmes embarked upon by Nigeria’s government portends
anti-youth posture, this group access to facilities of empowerment are
inhibited by sectionalism, corruption, bureaucratic bottle necks and several
other obstacles instituted at either micro or macro levels of implementation.
It is however suggested that impact evaluation strategy should complement
government initiative in ameliorating youth’s plight. The role of civil society
and general public in the planning and execution of youth related programmes
will invariably reduce youth vulnerability to amoral activities. National
rebirth is also crucial to solving youth problems. Within the government
environment, transparency, accountability, responsiveness, and commitment to
social welfare should become the norm and thus translated into values
underpinning youth aspirations.
The engagement of youth in community driven development also
constitute one important area youth problems can be addressed in Nigeria.
Strengthening and financing local initiatives such as entrepreneurial
development efforts, micro-finance loans, and other advances will go a long way
in reducing the current level of unemployment and poverty prevalent among the
youth. Youth energy should be re-directed towards positive productive efforts
and must be made result driven. The need to revisit the deteriorating energy
base of Nigeria hitherto disenabling the exhibition of youth potentials and the
provision of quality basic services constitute another important area that will
generate sporadic response and ginger economic spirit among the affected group.
Finally, the state should function to reduce youth physical and economic shocks
and help youth overcome their victimization caused by economic battering,
neglect and institutional deprivation which often occasion diverse recourse
into anti-social behaviors. To this end, there is need for the government, the
civil society and the general public to rise to the sustainable development of
the abandoned youth.
On the other hand, the roles of stakeholders in the educational
system cannot be exempted in this context. The school, the home and the
community, including religious institutions, should be used as centres to
impact value/character traits. Also, education sectoral groups, which include;parents’/
teachers association, professional associations, old students and alumni,
unions and other social movement organizations both non-governmental have an
important role to play. Sustainable development is impossible without investing
in the moral development of our youth.
This must be part of the effort to make them self-reliant, and able to
cultivate positive and responsible family and social relationship, thereby reducing
their vulnerability to abusive, violent and criminal activities like,
terrorism, militancy, robbery, burglary, forgery, cyber fraud and scam or other
anti-social behaviors.
0 comments:
Post a Comment